Calif. Mayors Ask Clinton: Spare Marijuana Clubs
Wednesday, March 18, 1998
By Andrew Quinn
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A group of California mayors asked President
Clinton Wednesday to
block a federal suit against the state's marijuana clubs, sharply
escalating the political and
legal battle over medical marijuana use.
"At stake is the well-being of 11,000 California residents,'' the mayors
of San Francisco,
Oakland, Santa Cruz and West Hollywood said in letters to Clinton. They
also asked him to
suspend enforcement of federal drug laws that interfere with the clubs'
daily operations.
"If the centers are shut down, many of these individuals will be compelled
to search back
alleys and street corners for their medicine,'' the mayors wrote. "This
will not only endanger
their lives, but place an unnecessary burden on our local police
departments.''
The mayors' plea comes ahead of a March 24 hearing in San Francisco on a
Justice Department bid
to shut down six California marijuana distribution clubs on the grounds
they violate federal
drug laws.
The suit, one of two filed in federal courts in San Francisco and San Jose,
marks a major legal
skirmish over California's Proposition 215, the state law voters approved
in 1996 which
legalized marijuana use for people suffering from AIDS, cancer and other
serious ailments.
California politicians are squaring off over the clubs, which have been the
major source of
marijuana for people who say it helps relieve a variety of symptoms ranging
from pain and
nausea to "nerves''.
California's Attorney General Dan Lungren has personally vowed to see the
clubs shut down,
while local leaders such as San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown and city
District Attorney Terence
(eds: one "r'' is correct) Hallinan have promised to keep them open.
Lungren's legal efforts were boosted last month when the state supreme
court sided with a lower
court ruling which said the clubs were illegal because they were not
"primary care givers''
for the patients they supply -- which is a condition set by the California
measure.
Although the supreme court ruling set the legal groundwork for closure of
the clubs, most are
still operating and their leaders say they can fight the semantics in
court.
Medical marijuana advocates are casting the battle as an issue of states'
rights versus the
federal government, saying federal officials should not be allowed to
override a compassionate
law approved by popular vote in California.
Federal officials say, however, they are not targeting ''medical use'' of
marijuana -- simply
the persistent violation of federal laws making it illegal to cultivate,
possess or distribute
the drug.
The mayors' letter urged Clinton to side with the clubs and said the
federal government should
allow local authorities to ''formalize dispensary systems that live up to
the spirit of the
law, and most importantly, make marijuana available, safe and accessible to
suffering
patients.''
They promised to abide by federal law, but asked for time to develop
"airtight'' regulation
and supervision of the dispensaries.
"We ask that the federal government respect local government's experience
and expertise in
potentially developing legal community-based solutions that benefit the
public health of our
residents,'' the mayors wrote.
San Francisco's Hallinan Monday indicated he was willing to defend the
city's right to set its
own policies.
In court papers, Hallinan said that if the current distribution system were
disrupted by
federal interference, San Francisco may ask its police to step in "to
distribute marijuana to
seriously ill people.''
^REUTERS@
|