DrugSense Home
DrugSense Weekly
December 8, 2000 #177


Table of Contents

* Breaking News (11/05/24)


* Feature Article


    Why Over 200,000 African-Americans Could Not Vote in Florida
    By Aaron Kipnis

* Weekly News in Review


Drug Policy-

COMMENT: (1-3)
(1) Downer- But is Robert Downey Jr Changing the Way the Media Looks at
        Drug Addiction?
(2) Downey and the Drug War
(3) Downey Case Shows Problem With Drug Laws
COMMENT: (4-6)
(4) Checkpoints for Drugs Unconstitutional
(5) Trimming the Dragnet
(6) Drug Searches
COMMENT: (7-8)
(7) Voters Ready to Reassess Drug 'War'
(8) Voters Dissent from the War on Drugs
COMMENT: (9)
(9) Drug War Fought in Regional Battles

Law Enforcement & Prisons-

COMMENT: (10-12)
(10) Released Papers Shine Floodlight On Profiling
(11) The 'Times' Says the DEA Started It
(12) Whitman Shuns Her Profiling Task
COMMENT: (13)
(13) 20/20 Downtown Transcript: Town On Trial
COMMENT: (14)
(14) Prop 36's Diversion of Addicts to Pose Huge Challenges

Cannabis & Hemp-

COMMENT: (15-16)
(15) Smoke Screen
(16) Court, Bush Best Hopes for Medical Pot
COMMENT: (17)
(17) Steve Kubby Takes Stand in Marijuana Trial
COMMENT: (18)
(18) Web: Reefer Monkey Madness

International News-

COMMENT: (19-21)
(19) Drugs, Defense, Congress And the Colombia Crisis 2000
(20) Military Aid - From the Private Sector
(21) U.S. Weighs Expanding Aid Plan to Colombia's Neighbors
COMMENT: (22)
(22) A Shared US-Mexican Drug Problem

* Hot Off The 'Net


    Dan Forbes Receives Journalism Award
    New HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report Released
    Report on racial profiling by the North Carolina State Highway Patrol
    City of Indianapolis et al v. Edmond et al.

* DrugSense Volunteer of the Month


    John Chase

* Quote of the Week


    John Lennon


FEATURE ARTICLE    (Top)

NOTE: The article below reflects the views of Mr.  Aaron Kipnis and does not necessarily reflect the views of DrugSense, MAP or its board of directors or membership.

Why Over 200,000 African-Americans Could Not Vote in Florida By Aaron Kipnis
Box 4782
Santa Barbara, CA.  93140

While charges fly over the handful of votes that will declare our next president, there is scant commentary about the 647,100 U.S.  citizens who were denied the right to vote in Florida in the last and still contested election.

Our fierce belief in the unalienable right of citizens to select their own leaders is one of the great hallmarks of American Democracy.  And, like many noble visions, it has taken a lot of sacrifice and courage to bring that vision forth.  Since the American Revolution our small tent of democracy has steadily grown.  Granted at first solely to the white male Founders, the vote has since been extended to former slaves, Native Americans, women, the less literate, the landless, the poor, and others initially denied citizen enfranchisement.

In Florida today, however, over 5 percent of the adult population are not allowed to vote.  This largely covert repeal of suffrage rights includes roughly one-in-three African-American men.  Florida undercuts their constituency more severely than any other state.  Following Governor Jeb Bush 's Florida, Governor George Bush's Texas has the nation's second largest group of disenfranchised voters.  Between these two states alone, over 1.2 million citizens, including more than a 1/3 of a million African Americans, are banned from the voting booth because of felony convictions on their records, most for small quantity drug crimes.

Disenfranchisement practices, like sentencing guidelines, vary widely from state to state.  Some citizens regain their right to vote in time, but in Florida many lose that unique herald of democracy for life.  In many states even felons only sentenced to probation or those honorably discharged from parole can be stripped of their civil rights.  The American Revolution was fought over similar injustices perpetrated against the "unrepresented" colonial subjects of King George.

Nationwide, almost 4 million adults today, a third of them African-Americans, are subjected to this statutory gerrymandering.  Many elections are decided by smaller margins.  Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall noted that disenfranchisement laws originated, "in the fogs and fictions of feudal jurisprudence." But most of us imagine that 21st century American Justice could evolve beyond the European norms of the Middle Ages.  Supreme Court Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist observes that, historically, these laws were deliberately "enacted with the intent of disenfranchising blacks." Given that most African-Americans voted Democratic in the last election, the face of American politics would dramatically shift were these barriers to voter participation finally torn down.

We are the only industrial democracy to disenfranchise massive voting blocks from the electorate.  Rather than leading the free world today, we now trail it by a shocking distance on this account.  The few nations that do practice voter disenfranchisement do so only toward those few who, through acts of terrorism, treason or other such crimes, demonstrate contempt for the democratic process itself.  South Africa, for example, another nation with a troubled history of black and white race relations, does not deny the vote to felons or even to incarcerated prisoners.  By comparison, it seems grotesque to sentence an American youth caught with fifteen dollars worth of drugs to lifelong exile from a participatory government.  The practice of disenfranchisement does not encourage the marginalized to ever embrace the system or attempt to work within it.  If anything, it breeds contempt for the law and cynicism about our capacity for justice and a truly representative democracy.  Let us resolve to do something before the next election to restore our nation to one in which the people, all the people, decide who will rule and how.  (Statistical sources for this article include: The Human Rights Watch; The Sentencing Project and The ACLU).

Dr.  Aaron Kipnis is a psychology professor in Santa Barbara and author of, "Angry Young Men: How Parents, Teachers, and Counselors Can Help 'Bad Boys' Become Good Men." For more information please visit http://www.malepsych.com/ Phone: 805-963-8285


WEEKLY NEWS IN REVIEW    (Top)


Domestic News- Policy

COMMENT: (1-3)    (Top)

Robert Downey Jr's latest arrest-right on the heels of passage of Proposition 36 in California- underscored, for most commentators, the damage done by our present approach to addiction.

Comments by Maia Szalovitz, Michelle Malkin, and Richard Cohen were typical of the majority.


(1) DOWNER- BUT IS ROBERT DOWNEY JR CHANGING THE WAY THE MEDIA LOOKS AT    (Top)DRUG ADDICTION?

Like Darryl Strawberry before him, actor Robert Downey, Jr.  is testing the limits of America's tolerance for relapse to addiction.  But this time- and in the aftermath of the success of a ballot initiative to give addicts several chances at treatment before jail sentences can be invoked in California-tolerance may be beginning to trump moralizing, and may well signal a readiness for a real debate on drug policy.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Fri, 01 Dec 2000
Source:   NewsWatch (US Web)
Website:   http://www.newswatch.org/
Feedback:   http://www.newswatch.org/talktomedia.htm
Contact:  
Copyright:   2000 www.NewsWatch.org
Author:   Maia Szalavitz, a contributing editor to NewsWatch
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1782/a07.html
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1797/a12.html
Bookmark:   http://www.mapinc.org/find?170 (Downey, Robert Jr.)


(2) DOWNEY AND THE DRUG WAR    (Top)

Actor Robert Downey Jr.  is California's glassy-eyed poster boy for the failed war on drugs.  After numerous arrests dating back to 1996 and several fruitless attempts by the courts to rehabilitate him, Mr.  Downey served a year in state prison....

...  Law enforcement officials may think it's good social policy to
make an example of the actor's weaknesses.  However, Mr. Downey's case simply underscores that the drug war is a costly and selective form of government paternalism that has done far more harm than good.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Sun, 03 Dec 2000
Source:   Washington Times (DC)
Copyright:   2000 News World Communications, Inc.
Contact:  
Website:   http://www.washtimes.com/
Author:   Michelle Malkin
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1654/a02.html
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1813/a05.html


(3) DOWNEY CASE SHOWS PROBLEM WITH DRUG LAWS    (Top)

I hope that when Hollywood gets around to making The Robert Downey Story, Mr.  Downey gets to play himself. He is one of the few screen actors around who has the talent, not to mention the experience, to convince the American people that a drug addict is a sick person and not a criminal.  But in the movie, as in life itself, Mr.  Downey will be a jailbird.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Mon, 04 Dec 2000
Source:   Dallas Morning News (TX)
Copyright:   2000 The Dallas Morning News
Contact:  
Feedback:   http://dmnweb.dallasnews.com/letters/
Website:   http://www.dallasnews.com/
Author:   Richard Cohen
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1817/a11.html


COMMENT: (4-6)    (Top)

The Supreme Court's decision barring routine highway drug checks (case background from the Munster, IN Times), was praised by most editorial writers as a long overdue restriction of police powers.

An intelligent nuance is contained in the conclusion of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram's editorial; one suggesting we shouldn't always trust this court on drug issues.


(4) CHECKPOINTS FOR DRUGS UNCONSTITUTIONAL    (Top)

U.S.  Supreme Court Strikes Down Roadblocks For Drug Searches

WASHINGTON, D.C.  - In a significant ruling on the use of police power, the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down random roadblocks intended for drug searches, saying they are an unreasonable invasion of privacy under the Constitution.

[snip]

Similarly, the majority rejected the idea that the checkpoints could also help catch drunks and drivers without valid licenses or registrations.

Under that justification, O'Connor wrote, "authorities would be able to establish checkpoints for virtually any purpose so long as they also included a license or sobriety check."

[snip]

Pubdate:   Wed, 29 Nov 2000
Source:   Munster Times (IN)
Copyright:   2000 The Munster Times
Contact:  
Website:   http://www.thetimesonline.com/
Authors:   Times Staff and Wire Report
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1786/a08.html
Related:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n000/a233.html


(5) TRIMMING THE DRAGNET    (Top)

Our View: The rights that protect criminal suspects are, in fact, the same rights that protect all Americans.

What's worse, illegal drugs being transported on our highways, or being stopped at a police roadblock so a trained dog can sniff your car for drugs?

The U.S.  Supreme Court ruled on that question this week, ruling 6-3 that those random drug roadblocks were unconstitutional.

Civil libertarians hailed the case as a victory for the rights of individuals, and we agree with them.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Fri, 01 Dec 2000
Source:   Danville Register & Bee (VA)
Copyright:   2000 Register Publishing Company
Feedback:   http://www.registerbee.com/headlines/edform.cfm
Website:   http://www.registerbee.com/
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1804/a01.html


(6) DRUG SEARCHES    (Top)

The Supreme Court affirms Fourth Amendment protections, but how far is it willing to go?

In welcome news, the Supreme Court ruled recently that it is unconstitutional to indiscriminately stop motorists to conduct a drug search with no specific suspicion of criminal wrongdoing.

[snip]

Though a welcome decision, the ruling did little to clarify an admittedly murky area of jurisprudence.  Supreme Court precedent concerning Fourth Amendment rights is an amalgam of exceptions, exemptions and gray areas.  O'Connor's decision enumerated the special consideration that the court has given in border areas, airports, schools and the vicinity of federal buildings.

In addition are the distinct standards that apply to searches of one's home, personal property and body.

Clarity is needed but unlikely.  The court increasingly approaches Fourth Amendment cases with no defining principle and little guide except its tortured precedent.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Mon, 04 Dec 2000
Source:   Ft.  Worth Star-Telegram (TX)
Copyright:   2000 Star-Telegram, Fort Worth, Texas
Contact:  
Website:   http://www.star-telegram.com/
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1817/a10.html


COMMENT: (7-8)    (Top)

Two OP-Eds in which reformers explained the significance of victorious drug policy initiatives were published.

An important point by Ethan Nadelmann - that Prop 36 will be implemented by hostile bureaucrats - was also raised in an item considered under Prisons.


(7) VOTERS READY TO REASSESS DRUG 'WAR'    (Top)

Controversy surrounding the presidential election continues to dominate national and local media to the detriment of other decisive and important expressions of voter will.  All but ignored has been a national voter movement for a more rational, just, and cost-effective drug policy.

[snip]

While the verdict may still be out, in this election voters in five states indicated the government cannot subvert due process protections in the name of the drug war; properly administered, marijuana is a valuable treatment for certain chronic illness; and the criminal justice system should focus on sending nonviolent offenders into treatment, not prison.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Thu, 30 Nov 2000
Source:   New Haven Register (CT)
Copyright:   2000, New Haven Register
Contact:  
Website:   http://www.ctcentral.com/cgi-bin/w3com/start?ctcentral+FrontPage
Author:   Jelani Lawson, http://www.mapinc.org/authors/Lawson+Jelani
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1792/a07.html
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1653/a05.html
Note:   Jelani Lawson is a member of New Haven' s Board of Aldermen and
executive director of A Better Way Foundation, which advocates for public health and treatment solutions to substance abuse.


(8) VOTERS DISSENT FROM THE WAR ON DRUGS    (Top)

Election Day 2000 was a big day for drug policy reform.

In California, voters overwhelmingly endorsed Proposition 36, the "treatment instead of incarceration" ballot initiative that should result in tens of thousands of nonviolent drug-possession offenders being diverted from jail and prison into programs that may help them get their lives together.

[snip]

Powerful vested interests in the criminal justice business, accustomed to getting their way, did not look kindly on the challenges the proposition posed to the status quo.  If California's new law is implemented in good faith, with minimal corruption of its intentions, the benefits could be extraordinary...

Proposition 36 also provides a model -- both for initiatives in other states where public opinion favors reform but the legislature and/or the governor are unable or unwilling to comply, and in states such as New York, where no ballot initiative process exists to repeal Draconian and archaic laws.  The initiative victories demonstrated once again that the public is ahead of the politicians when it comes to embracing pragmatic drug policy reforms.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Sat, 02 Dec 2000
Source:   Alameda Times-Star (CA)
Copyright:   2000 MediaNews Group, Inc.  and ANG Newspapers
Contact:  
Website:   http://www.newschoice.com/newspapers/alameda/times/
Author:   Ethan A.  Nadelmann, http://www.mapinc.org/authors/Nadelmann+E
Note:   Ethan A.  Nadelmann writes for the Los Angeles Times.
Bookmark:   For Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act items
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1805/a11.html


COMMENT: (9)    (Top)

ONDCP's press release on McCzar's final report suggests it will be a brazen effort to put the best possible face on the thriving club drug and meth markets which developed after he took the helm.

"Regional" problem indeed! Maybe he thinks the electorate that chose Dubya will believe anything.


(9) DRUG WAR FOUGHT IN REGIONAL BATTLES    (Top)

WASHINGTON--With cocaine use waning, authorities waged the war on drugs this year with strategies tailored to the regional battlegrounds: marijuana in the Appalachian states, methamphetamine in the Rocky Mountains, cocaine in South Florida.

"There is no longer any one drug that consumes America as cocaine did in the 1980s," said Gen.  Barry R. McCaffrey, director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Tue, 5 Dec 2000
Source:   Los Angeles Times (CA)
Copyright:   2000 Los Angeles Times
Contact:  
Website:   http://www.latimes.com/
Author:   Associated Press
Cited:   ONDCP: http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1821/a03.html


Law Enforcement & Prisons

COMMENT: (10-12)    (Top)

New Jersey is where profiling first attracted the NYT attention that eventually made it a national issue; a recent record review proved the first official response had been to deny and cover up.

The Bergen Record reported how drug war zeal started the process in New Jersey (and elsewhere), while Cynthia Cotts added extensive background involving other media cover-ups and obfuscations of the issue; plus the solid, but unacknowledged contributions of spurned reporter Gary Webb.

A local editorial itemized her sins and pulled no punches in taking Governor Whitman to task.


(10) RELEASED PAPERS SHINE FLOODLIGHT ON PROFILING    (Top)

It looked like the perfect profile stop.

A silver Dodge minivan with New York plates traveling south on the New Jersey Turnpike after 11 p.m.  Inside are a young black driver and three minority passengers.  The van appears to be speeding.

[snip]

Last week, Attorney General John Farmer released 91,000 pages of internal documents that detail how race became a weapon of choice in the state's war on drugs.  The papers show that racial profiling was not only a favored weapon, but a secret one, its official existence disavowed for a decade by the state's top law enforcers.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Sun, 03 Dec 2000
Source:   Bergen Record (NJ)
Copyright:   2000 Bergen Record Corp.
Contact:  
Feedback:   http://www.bergen.com/cgi-bin/feedback
Website:   http://www.bergen.com/
Authors:   Jeff Pillets And Wendy Ruderman, Trenton Bureau
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1813/a07.html
Bookmark:   http://www.mapinc.org/racial.htm (Racial Issues)


(11) THE 'TIMES' SAYS THE DEA STARTED IT    (Top)

New Jersey Cops To Racism

In the last few weeks, the insane election coverage has buried a more profound story: Racial profiling exists! For years, stories of black and Latino drivers being searched on the basis of skin color alone were dismissed as anecdotal.  But according to 91,000 pages of documents released by New Jersey officials last week, racial profiling has been standard operating procedure in that state for the last decade, and 80 percent of the state's highway searches have involved black and Latino drivers.

[snip]

The unconstitutional drug war is a national scandal, and the Times is right to blame the DEA for it.  But it's not news. Esquire first broke the story in April 1999, when it published "Driving While Black," a 7400-word feature asserting that racial profiling is a case of "your tax dollars at work."

The Esquire story was written by Gary Webb, who is best known for his 1996 San Jose Mercury News series accusing the CIA of using the cocaine trade to buy guns for the Nicaraguan contras.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Tue, 05 Dec 2000
Source:   Village Voice (NY)
Copyright:   2000 VV Publishing Corporation
Contact:  
Feedback:   http://www.villagevoice.com/aboutus/contact.shtml
Website:   http://www.villagevoice.com/
Author:   Cynthia Cotts
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1824/a07.html


(12) WHITMAN SHUNS HER PROFILING TASK    (Top)

Good Of The State Demands An Apology

The time has come for Christie Whitman to acknowledge her culpability in the issue of racial profiling.  To this point, the governor's behavior has been disheartening: She seeks credit for putting an end to the practice but refuses to accept responsibility for allowing it to flourish for six years of her term.  This tactic is demeaning to the state's minority citizens and to the state police.  It also reeks of insincerity.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Sun, 03 Dec 2000
Source:   Home News Tribune (NJ)
Copyright:   2000 Home News Tribune
Contact:  
Website:   http://www.thnt.com/hnt/
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1814/a06.html


COMMENT: (13)    (Top)

There was more national notice of the Tulia obscenity when ABC aired a special report.  The defensive attitude of locals dramatically underscores how racial bias feeds on the drug war.


(13) 20/20 DOWNTOWN TRANSCRIPT: TOWN ON TRIAL    (Top)

Big Drug Bust Leads To Countercharges Of Racism

Announcer:   DOWNTOWN begins, with TOWN ON TRIAL.  And now, Jami Floyd.

JAMI FLOYD reporting:

Tulia, Texas is the kind of town where the dust rises under your feet with every step, and they roll up the sidewalks just after dark.  It's a place that's quiet, and empty, and the folks who live here, black and white, all know one another, most of them by name.  It's not the sort of place you'd expect to find a big drug problem, let alone a major drug ring.  ...

[snip]

FLOYD (VO): One hundred thirty-two jurors in the Tulia cases voted to convict based largely on Coleman's testimony, and the powdered cocaine he produced in court.  Cocaine, he said, came from the defendants. We spoke with five of the jurors from two of the Tulia trials.

(OC) You don't think any of these 46 or so people are innocent?

Mr.  DARYL TRUCKER (Juror): Nope.

Ms.  SUE RIDDICK (Juror): It would be real nice if they were. It would be real easy to get on the other side of it.  No.

Ms.  VENTURA RAMOS (Juror): These are the people we have to get rid of, then let it be.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Mon, 4 Dec 2000
Source:   ABC News 20/20 Downtown
Copyright:   2000 ABC News
Contact:   http://www.abcnews.go.com/onair/email.html
http://boards.go.com/cgi/abcnews/request.dll?LIST&room=abcnews_2020downtown
Website:   http://www.abcnews.go.com/onair/Downtown/DowntownIndex.html
Anchors:   Elizabeth Vargas
Reporters:   Jami Floyd
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1823/a10.html


COMMENT: (14)    (Top)

Passage of Proposition 36 was one thing; implementation another.  An article in the LAT suggests that different perceptions will be colliding over the next several months as details are hammered out.

Even the headline writer assumes every arrestee is an "addict."


(14) PROP 36'S DIVERSION OF ADDICTS TO POSE HUGE CHALLENGES    (Top)

Probation officer Randall Gallegos has a sixth sense about the drug-addled ex-offenders he supervises, and all kinds of alarms were going off recently when a young woman and her two children sat down in front of him.

[snip]

The county's courts will be flooded with an estimated 20,000 new drug offenders each year who will be diverted into treatment programs--and those programs are expected to mushroom.

[snip]

Albert M.  Senella, chief operating officer of Tarzana Treatment Centers Inc.  and president of the California Assn. of Alcohol and Drug Program Executives, fears that pressure from police, prosecutors and judges will divert Proposition 36 funds from treatment to law enforcement.

He is also concerned that judges, rather than rehab experts, will decide on the kind of treatment addicts will receive.

"Everybody wants a slice of the pie," he said.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Sun, 03 Dec 2000
Source:   Los Angeles Times (CA)
Copyright:   2000 Los Angeles Times
Contact:  
Website:   http://www.latimes.com/
Author:   Carla Rivera
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1813/a03.html


Cannabis & Hemp-

COMMENT: (15-16)    (Top)

The decision of the Supremes to hear the federal case against the OCBC touched off a wave of speculation and comment.  For the conservative San Diego Union-Tribune the decision is a foregone conclusion, while Chris Weikopf of the decidedly more liberal Los Angeles News pointed out some delicious political incongruities.


(15) SMOKE SCREEN    (Top)

High Court Considers Medicinal Marijuana

Advocates of marijuana legalization were chastened back in September when the U.S.  Supreme Court barred a cannabis "buyers club" in Oakland from distributing marijuana.

[snip]

If exceptions are to be made to the federal Controlled Substances Act, if the possession and use of marijuana is to be legalized for ostensible medicinal purposes, then it is up to Congress to amend the law.

Proposition 215 and the other similar state laws represent an attempt by marijuana legalization advocates to do an end run around Congress, to subvert federal drug law.  It is almost certain that the U.S. Supreme Court will strike down these state laws as unconstitutional.

Pubdate:   Fri, 01 Dec 2000
Source:   San Diego Union Tribune (CA)
Copyright:   2000 Union-Tribune Publishing Co.
Contact:  
Website:   http://www.uniontrib.com/
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1795/a07.html


(16) COURT, BUSH BEST HOPES FOR MEDICAL POT    (Top)

With some notable exceptions, the drug-legalization crowd tends to be dominated by those for whom easy access to narcotics is less a philosophical imperative than a personal preference.  They want to end the war on drugs only because they'd rather smoke the peace pipe.

[snip]

Gore might like to wax on about how "a vote is not just a piece of paper, a vote is a human voice," but ever since Proposition 215 made the ballot, the administration has done all it can to silence the clear voice of California voters.  ...

[snip]

Pubdate:   Sun, 03 Dec 2000
Source:   Daily News of Los Angeles (CA)
Copyright:   2000 Daily News of Los Angeles
Feedback:   http://www.DailyNews.com/contact/letters.asp
Website:   http://www.DailyNews.com/
Author:   Chris Weikopf, Daily News staff writer
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1813/a01.html


COMMENT: (17)    (Top)

In a relevant case being tried in California, the defendant took the stand- both to deny sales and affirm the real benefits that cannabis has conferred on him.


(17) STEVE KUBBY TAKES STAND IN MARIJUANA TRIAL    (Top)

He disputes prosecutor's contention that he was a big dealer

Steve Kubby told jurors Thursday that it was donations for his work as a medicinal marijuana advocate, not from pot sales, that produced a steady flow of money from Oakland and San Francisco cannabis buyers clubs.

[snip]

Kubby said marijuana not only curbed his cancer, it saved his life when he broke his neck in 1991.  That incident helped convince Kubby to became a pot advocate.

"It was my belief that cannabis prevented my paralysis and my death, and could benefit people that way too," he said.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Fri, 01 Dec 2000
Source:   Auburn Journal (CA)
Copyright:   2000 Auburn Journal
Contact:  
Website:   http://www.auburnjournal.com/
Author:   Gus Thomson, Journal Staff Writer
Bookmark:   MAP's archived items re Steve Kubby:
http://www.mapinc.org/kubby.htm
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1798/a04.html


COMMENT: (18)    (Top)

Finally, Susan McCarthy's dissection a yet another NIDA experiment designed to prove that cannabis is indistinguishable from heroin is too good to be ignored.  Read every word; you'll enjoy it.


(18) WEB: REEFER MONKEY MADNESS    (Top)

Researchers Persuade Simians To Get Themselves Stoned -- And Say It Helps Prove That Dope Is Addictive.

Nov.  29, 2000 | The National Institute on Drug Abuse has four bakehead monkeys, and the researchers who enabled them are just as thrilled as they can be.  The fact that, after long toil, they have succeeded in the unprecedented feat of inducing these monkeys to introduce THC into the temples of their bodies proves that marijuana is like "other abusable, addicting substances," according to NIDA director Dr.  Alan I. Leshner.

[snip]

Interestingly, the researchers were forced to reverse the usual course and portray cocaine as a gateway drug to marijuana.  The journal article doesn't reveal why the researchers started with cocaine-using monkeys -- maybe that's all they had around the lab.  Ingenious! Next thing you know, heroin will lead to coffee.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Tue, 28 Nov 2000
Source:   Salon (US Web)
Copyright:   2000 Salon
Contact:  
Feedback:   http://www.salon.com/contact/letters/
Website:   http://www.salon.com/
Author:   Susan McCarthy
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1783/a08.html


International News


COMMENT: (19-21)    (Top)

Most critics consider Plan Colombia too much spent in a lost cause, but an article in the Armed Forces Journal insists it's necessary only because we didn't spend more earlier.

The Tampa Tribune provided some ominous details on use of American mercenaries in Colombia; a tactic that achieved quick results in Croatia.

As if that were not enough, an ominous NYT article disclosed that Plan Colombia may be the just first installment for "Plan South America-" all ultimately in the name of our domestic drug war.  The quagmire deepens.


(19) DRUGS, DEFENSE, CONGRESS AND THE COLOMBIA CRISIS 2000    (Top)

Some People See Further Into The Future Than Others.

Deep cuts in international counter-drug spending during the early 1990s, coupled with diminished interest in South and Central America by the Clinton Administration and a remarkable underestimation of the link between drug traffickers and South American terrorist movements, have now come home to roost.  These factors have given rise to the most virulent strain of drug-funded guerrilla activity and the greatest potential for regional instability in more than two decades.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Fri, 01 Dec 2000
Source:   Armed Forces Journal International (US)
Page:   10
Contact:  
Website:   http://www.afji.com/
Author:   Robert B.  Charles
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1810/a05.html
Related:   http://www.mapinc.org/areas/Colombia


(20) MILITARY AID - FROM THE PRIVATE SECTOR    (Top)

When the Pentagon decided to send Colombia military help for the war on drugs, it chose to outsource it.

As U.S.  assistance to war-fatigued Colombia escalates, the Clinton administration portrays American military involvement there as nothing more than basic anti-drug fighting aid.

[snip]

But the Clinton administration quietly has hired a high-level group of former U.S.  military personnel whose job far exceeds the narrow focus of the drug war and is intended to turn the Colombian military into a first-class war machine capable of winning a decades-old leftist insurgency.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Sun, 03 Dec 2000
Source:   St.  Petersburg Times (FL)
Copyright:   2000 St.  Petersburg Times
Contact:  
Website:   http://www.sptimes.com/
Author:   Paul La Garza and David Adams
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1811/a03.html


(21) U.S. WEIGHS EXPANDING AID PLAN TO COLOMBIA'S NEIGHBORS    (Top)

WASHINGTON, Dec.  3 - Even as its $1.3 billion anti-drug program for Colombia is off to a sputtering start, the United States is making plans to expand its aid and cooperation to combat a "spillover effect" of drug trafficking and guerrilla activities in neighboring Latin American nations, Clinton administration officials say.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Mon, 4 Dec 2000
Source:   New York Times (NY)
Copyright:   2000 The New York Times Company
Contact:  
Website:   http://www.nytimes.com/
Author:   Christopher Marquis
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1816/a06.html


COMMENT: (22)    (Top)

Before Vicente Fox's Inauguration celebration even started, an annoyed Tampa Tribune editorial warned him against rocking the US drug policy boat.


(22) A SHARED US-MEXICAN DRUG PROBLEM    (Top)

In July, Mexican voters elected moderate conservative Vicente Fox of the National Action Party (PAN) as president, ending seven decades of rule by one political party, the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI).

Fox, who will be inaugurated today, offers much promise with his pledge to build on the North American Free Trade Agreement and encourage private enterprise.

[snip]

But Fox's finger-pointing at the United States is a time-worn tactic used by national leaders all over the world: Blame foreigners for recurring internal problems, and thus divert public anger that might otherwise be directed toward domestic leaders.  What both Fox and officials on this side of the river need to do is acknowledge that each has a drug problem to deal with.

[snip]

Pubdate:   Fri, 01 Dec 2000
Source:   Tampa Tribune (FL)
Copyright:   2000, The Tribune Co.
Contact:  
Website:   http://www.tampatrib.com/
URL:   http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1805/a02.html
Related:   http://www.mapinc.org/areas/Mexico


HOT OFF THE 'NET    (Top)


Dan Forbes Receives Journalism Award

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, Dec.  1, 2000, 3 p.m. -- The winners of the inaugural Online Journalism Awards (OJAs) were announced today by the Online News Association (ONA) and the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism. http://www.journalists.org).  Among the Recipients Dan Forbes was recognized. See also
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1810/a04.html

http://www.mapinc.org/forbes.htm

Submitted by Richard Lake, http://www.mapinc.org/rlake/


The new HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report - US HIV and AIDS Cases Reported Through June 2000 Midyear Edition Vol.  12, No. 1, has been released by the CDC-NCHSTP-Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention.  It can be obtained from
the following URL:  
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/stats/hasrlink.htm

For those who are interested, a report on racial profiling by the North Carolina State Highway Patrol, "Evaluating North Carolina State Highway Patrol Data: Citations, Warnings, and Searches in 1998" by the North Carolina Center for Crime and Justice Research (NCCCJR) at North Carolina State University and the Center for Criminal Justice Research & International Initiatives (CCJRII) at North Carolina Central University for the state of North Carolina is now available at:

Copies of the opinion in this case (City of Indianapolis et al v. Edmond et al.) and the dissents from Justices Rehnquist and Thomas are also available from the Legal Information Institute at Cornell.  The URL is: http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-1030.ZS.html

Submitted by Doug McVay, http://www.drugwarfacts.org/


DRUGSENSE VOLUNTEER OF THE MONTH    (Top)

John Chase

This month we recognize John Chase.

John is hard working member of the November Coalition.  As with many activists, he never feels that working with just one organization is enough.  He contributes to the Media Awareness Project with many letters to the editors, NewsHawking and editing.  We asked them a few questions:

1.  When and why did you become involved in the drug policy area?

In December 1997 I finally decided to come off the sidelines because the drug war looked like it wasn't going anywhere, and I had some free time.  I am a Republican with a civil libertarian bent.

2.  How did you get into writing Letters to the Editor?

I've always written letters to papers, but never about illegal drugs, and never with such intensity as in the past three years.  In December 1997 I'd just begun to look around the Internet and found Ethan Nadelmann's article "A Commonsense Drug Policy" in the Jan/Feb issue of Foreign Affairs.  That was all I needed to write my first letter. I was so green about email I sent it to the St Petersburg Times in Russia.  Someone there knew enough English to tell me what I'd done. I finally got it to the St.Pete Times in Florida and they published it. In this rather slow learning process I connected with MAP in July 1998 and have continued to learn.  Some of us write better than others. My batting average is about 10%, I think.  I never measured it. This is a labor of love.

3.  What do you consider the most significant story/issue of the past     months?

The realization of the racial bias in the enforcement of anti-drug laws, simply Jim crow laws gone national, a form of population control, a story reinforced of course by the youthful indiscretions of the two leading candidates for president.

4.  What are your favorite websites, besides the MAP/DrugSense sites?

These are my favorites not in the American drug reform mainstream. http://www.intellicast.com/ Weather
http://google.com/ Search engine
http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py Yahoo maps
http://www.admin.ch/bag/sucht/e/index.htm Swiss drug info http://emcdda.kpnqwest.pt/ EU Monitoring Center - drugs

5.  Is there anything else you would like to tell the readers of the     weekly?

When the drug czar complains about MAP, as he has done at least twice, MAP is doing something right.  For me MAP has been a wonderful real-time complement to more traditional libraries.  When students email The November Coalition looking for direction in doing research, I always recommend MAP as THE resource to find reliable, current news about the drug war, pro and con.  Very important to have both pro and con and to keep the archive as reliable as possible.


QUOTE OF THE WEEK    (Top)

"We all have Hitler in us, but we also have love and peace.  So why not give peace a chance for once?" - John Lennon (1940-December 8, 1980)


DS Weekly is one of the many free educational services DrugSense offers our members.  Watch this feature to learn more about what DrugSense can do for you.

TO SUBSCRIBE, UNSUBSCRIBE, OR UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:

Please utilize the following URLs

http://www.drugsense.org/hurry.htm

http://www.drugsense.org/unsub.htm

News/COMMENTS-Editor:   Tom O'Connell ()
Senior-Editor:   Mark Greer ()

We wish to thank all our contributors, editors, NewsHawks and letter writing activists.

NOTICE:  

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.  Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

REMINDER:  

Please help us help reform.  Become a NewsHawk

See http://www.mapinc.org/hawk.htm for info on contributing clippings.


NOW YOU CAN DONATE TO DRUGSENSE ON LINE AND IT'S TAX DEDUCTIBLE

DrugSense provides many services at no charge BUT THEY ARE NOT FREE TO PRODUCE.

We incur many costs in creating our many and varied services.  If you are able to help by contributing to the DrugSense effort visit our convenient donation web site at
http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm

-OR-

Mail in your contribution.  Make checks payable to MAP Inc. send your contribution to:

The Media Awareness Project (MAP) Inc.
D/B/a DrugSense
PO Box 651
Porterville,
CA 93258
(800) 266 5759

http://www.mapinc.org/
http://www.drugsense.org/


RSS DrugSense Weekly current issue this issue

Back Issues: 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010