DrugSense Home
DrugSense Weekly
August 18, 2000 #162

Abbreviated Shadow Convention Issue

NOTE:   This is a special abbreviated edition of the DrugSense Weekly
focusing primarily on the Los Angeles Shadow Convention.  We will return to our normal format next week.


Table of Contents

* Breaking News (12/21/24)


* Feature Article


    3 Overviews of the Los Angeles Shadow Convention

    August 15, An Important Day in History / by Tom O'Connell,

    Heat and Excitement / by Mark Greer

    Star Struck / by Jo-D Dunbar

* Related Links


* Hot Off The 'Net


    DNC Drug Policy Platform
    Campbell Senate Race  Article - National Journal
    C-Span Video clips

* Quote of the Week


    Richard M. Nixon


3 FEATURE ARTICLES    (Top)

August 15, An Important Day in History
by Tom O'Connell, http://www.mapinc.org/to/

Most regulars have by now figured out that the Weekly tries to update its readers on the course of the drug war as reported by the main stream English-language media.  We hardly ever report news ourselves; instead, we usually just comment on what media professionals have written in the previous week.  With that in mind, it's a damn good thing Mark Greer, my wife Judy, and I all went to LA's Patriotic Hall last Tuesday; otherwise we'd have missed the first day of the beginning of the end of the drug war.  This is particularly so because none of the reporters in the audience seem to have understood what they saw and heard; at least judging by what's been published to date (this is written on the afternoon of August 17 while I listen to as much as I can stand of Al Gore's speech with one ear.).

The mainstream media's amazing incomprehension has placed me in the interesting position of breaking a major news story; there is no oblique or subtle way to put it: on Tuesday, August 15, key black members of the House of Representatives appearing separately at the Shadow Convention disavowed the drug war and pledged as individuals to do all they can to either undo or mitigate its punitive provisions. They all explained their statements- the first unfriendly to the drug war by elected federal officials in recent memory- as inspired by mounting credible evidence that the drug war is not only ineffective, but racist; falling far more heavily on blacks and Hispanics than on whites; even though many more whites use illegal drugs.  They were delivered in separate short addresses by John Conyers of Michigan, Maxine Waters of California, and Charles Rangel of New York- each possibly without the others' knowledge.  The three were seconded by Jesse Jackson, (who also spoke in Philadelphia) who delivered what was easily the day's most eloquent condemnation of the drug war; incidentally, Jackson's presence endows his rhetoric with an impact TV can only hint at.

I use the word, "separate," because in the small intimate (and stifling) confines of Patriotic Hall, it was possible to observe that all entered and left separately and at different times, so they did not hear each other's remarks; if they had discussed them with each other beforehand, it had to have been down the street at the Staples Center. My own view is that these statements reflect the considerable political acumen of three highly successful politicians who are able to recognize a loser when they see one.

As if this blockbuster news weren't enough (Conyers and Rangel weren't even on the program and said they'd responded to last minute urgings by Arianna Huffington), the day's other key development was that a cohesive and goal-directed political movement is finally emerging from the fragmented and contentious drug policy reform movement.  Long a debating society for intellectuals, the "movement" has attracted some elected politicians at long last.  It has also acquired a more clearly defined goal, repudiation of the drug war, which could be summed up by a chant taken up by the faithful when Representative Conyers suggested what to do with elected officials who continue to stand by the status quo: "Send them home!"

How did all this happen so quickly and what does it mean? The answer to the first question also answers another one- originally pondered after the triumph of the first medical cannabis initiatives in '96 and debated after each subsequent success: how can an undisciplined and fragmented drug reform lobby take advantage of its victories and transform itself into a disciplined political movement? The answer proved amazingly simple: induce a savvy and courageous celebrity with respectable media credentials into becoming an ardent convert to the cause: as unlikely as it first seemed, Arianna Huffington has become a perfect catalyst; a few months after her conversion, the "Shadow Conventions" were planned and financed by George Soros.

Even so, the original purpose of the Shadow Conventions was simply to steal media attention from the big boys; to discuss drug war and other issues (campaign finance reform and the deepening wealth gap) that major political parties stubbornly refuse to even mention.  It must be said that this innovative strategy was pretty much a bust.  Although the print media gave them some decent and intelligent coverage in the weeks leading up to them, TV coverage while the Shadows were in session can only be called abysmal (not even CNN); even worse: those print sources which had written about them earlier seemed to lose interest.  That's precisely why most of the world has yet to know of the electrifying events of last Tuesday; in fact, I have to constantly remind myself I was really there and actually heard the words of Conyers, Waters, Jackson and Rangel with my own ears.  Those activists who attended both conventions told me the atmospherics in Philly easily matched those of LA; what was different about LA was that three important Democrats were coaxed into going AWOL from the drug war's army.

Thus, serendipity played a key role; a ploy undertaken to generate media coverage seems instead to have goaded some astute politicians into jumping ship, but let no one think it was spur of the moment..

Also,let there be no doubt; their words were not in the least equivocal; they were also uttered with conviction, to a live audience and recorded on video for posterity.  For those with a memory long enough to recall how Rangel had destroyed Kurt Schmoke in front of a Congressional Committee in the late Eighties, there was almost a graceful mea culpa.  And for additional emphasis, both Conyers and Rangel reminded us that if the Democrats recapture a majority in the House, they will become chairmen of the powerful Judiciary and Ways and Means Committees respectively.

Heady business indeed.

Other developments at the LA Shadow Convention- although pale compared to the defection of three ranking House members from the drug war- are nevertheless important.  New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson remains a firm proponent of ending the drug war as we know it and has honed his rhetoric into a far more effective speech; he's been joined by an equally unlikely ally, Ross "Rocky" Anderson, the youthful and articulate Republican mayor of Salt Lake City (yes, Salt Lake City!). As if that weren't enough, Tom Campbell, who I wasn't able to hear on Sunday., will be in a very high profile Senate race against drug war hawk Diane Feinstein in California.  That race will also give important additional exposure to the prison and drug policy issues since it will be conducted against the backdrop of yet another California initiative, Proposition 36; mandating treatment rather than prison for an estimated 37,000 drug users per year.

The somewhat complex provisions of Proposition 36 were ably explained on Tuesday by Bill Zimmerman, one of its sponsors (also a prime mover of medical cannabis initiatives).  Although not all most reformers would want if they could choose, it's a reasonable compromise for which polls show very strong voter support.  That support could be the key to a Campbell victory of Feinstein, who, along with most law enforcement officials, will strongly favor the status quo.

Finally, speaking of refining speeches, Ethan Nadelmann outdid himself; delivering his updated and more radical version in between shepherding events and introducing speakers from opening to close of this inspiring and historic day.  Those who were there will tell their grandchildren: August 15, 2000 was the beginning of the end of America's misbegotten war on drugs.

No doubt about it.

Tom O'Connell


Heat and Excitement
by Mark Greer, http://www.mapinc.org/mg/

Heat and excitement! Those were the two words that best described the Los Angeles Shadow Convention in my view.

After being refused entrance on opening day on Sunday due to lack of seating and being forced to mingle around the stifling halls and exhibit rooms, I arrived on Tuesday with a bit of an attitude.  We arrived early and insured our seats despite a rather aggressive attempt to again coerce seating arrangements.  The floor personnel seemed to get that they were flirting with a possible scene and left me to the seat I was not about to give up after Sundays fiasco.

By far the most exciting development was that of a "pro reform black caucus" coming out for the first time at the L.A.  Shadow. I almost had to pinch my self when a line up including Maxine Waters, Jesse Jackson, Rep.  John Conyers, and almost unimaginably Rep. Charlie Rangel of New York all showed up and spoke in opposition to the drug war.  Rangel has long been an outspoken drug warrior and his epiphany was a shockingly pleasant surprise.

Unfortunately the media seemed to utterly miss this profound turn of events as the print media missed the point and the broadcast media simply failed to cover the Shadow Conventions in anything like the manner it deserved.

The L.A.  Shadow, and the Tuesday drug war focus was even more notable given that on the same stage and on the same day, Arianna Huffington, Rep Tom Campbell and Gov, Gary Johnson, all Republicans (all though Arianna refers to herself as a "recovering republican") also came out as opposed to the drug war.

There were too many powerful speeches and heart wrenching stories to begin to cover here but all major issues were covered and extraordinarily well in my view.  Even some of the people whose views I had previously questioned seemed articulate and knowledgeable on the subject of sensible reform.

The location was probably as good as could be expected given that the Democratic convention had sucked up every decent locality for miles around.  Patriotic Hall served nicely with the very notable exception that the building has no air conditioning.  It appeared that a mobile unit had been shipped in making the hall itself liveable but the rest of the building was absolutely brutal in its heat and humidity.  Air conditioning in LA in August is not considered optional by most folks. Long waiting lines and lack of seating both added to frustration and to the sense of urgency and excitement.

Overall I would call the L.A.  Shadow Convention a profound event. The fact that press utterly missed it in favor of a humdrum Democratic Convention and while eagerly hoping for some protestors to break a few windows reflects poorly on the media but very well indeed upon the burgeoning reform movement and in particular the organizers of the Shadow Conventions.  This day may well be looked upon in days to come as the beginning of the end of our failed drug war.

------

Star Struck!
by Jo-D Dunbar, http://www.mapinc.org/jo-d/

Even though I live in California I do not live in or spend much time in Hollywood.  The number of 'stars' who flooded in and out of the Shadow Convention was incredible and a preview of times to come.  As more famous people speak out against our failed drug war, more citizens will listen to our truthful message and understand that this war must end.

I live within 2 miles of the ocean where it is always 70 degrees.  My body totally rejected the LA heat so I spent much of my time near a huge fan in the corner of the lobby.  This actually turned out to be a good thing as I quickly realized that this fan was situated between the green room where the speakers waited their turn and the entrance to the auditorium where they gave their speeches!

I stood star struck as big names proceeded within arm's reach of my position all day.  Politicians Judge James Gray, Governor Gary Johnson, Mayor Rocky Anderson, Maxine Waters, Rep.  Tom Campbell and Tom Hayden broke the typical politicians' mold by speaking against our current drug policies.  Movie stars Al Franken, Susan Saradon, Tim Robbins, Bill Maher and Tommy Smothers shunned political correctness by giving powerful speeches against throwing sick, addicted people in jail instead of giving them the treatment that they need and deserve.

This is the beginning of the end! Additional actors will see that speaking out against the drug war hasn't harmed these actors' reputations.  Other politicians will notice that these politicians will not be rejected during the next election.  These people will then see that it is OK to speak with the truth when discussing our failed drug war.  Citizens will hear that our drug policies are unjust and vote for the politicians who have the guts to say it.


RELATED LINKS    (Top)

Shadow Conventions Homepage
http://www.shadowconventions.com/

MAP News Clippings
http://www.mapinc.org/shadow.htm

DPF/TLC Shadow Conventions Page
http://www.drugpolicy.org/shadowconventions/

Arriana Huffington Online
http://www.ariannaonline.com/

Raising Hell at the DNC
http://www.alternet.org/?IssueAreaID=9

CNN DNC Page
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/conventions/democratic/


HOT OFF THE 'NET    (Top)

DNC Drug Policy Platform

To contrast the sensibilities posed at the Shadow Conventions below is a survey from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) web site on "the best way to fight illegal drugs."

You must register to participate.

http://www.drugsense.org/dncsurvey/

What is the most effective way to fight the war on drugs?

1-Require drug testing of anyone arrested for a federal crime

2-Support innovative drug courts which force drug users to get treatment or go to jail

3-Protect residents of public housing from violent criminals who use their homes as a base for the drug trade

4-Fight casual drug use by young people through education and public service announcements

5-Support the death penalty for drug kingpins

Clueless? Braindead? Foolish? Uninformed? Pick your adjective but the DNC comes up a loser on all 5 suggestions in our view.


Campbell Senate Race Article - National Journal

An article on the Tom Campbell race for Senate is now on the National Journal website.  The National Journal is available to nonsubscribers through the end of the Democratic convention on August 18, and there's a lot on that website, do check it out.

http://nationaljournal.com/members/adspotlight/2000/08/0804tcca1.htm

Submitted by Doug McVay


C-Span Video clips

While it appears that broadcast media coverage for the L.A.  Shadow was even more abysmal than for Philly C-Span still has clips of some Philly coverage at:

http://video.c-span.org:8080/ramgen/kdrive/c2k073000_shadow2.rm http://video.c-span.org:8080/ramgen/ldrive/rnc080200_shadow.rm http://video.c-span.org:8080/ramgen/ldrive/rnc080300_shadow.rm


QUOTE OF THE WEEK    (Top)

We have to find ways to clear the courts of the endless stream of "victimless crimes" that get in the way of serious consideration of serious crimes.  There are more important matters for highly skilled judges and prosecutors than minor traffic offenses, loitering and drunkenness.

-- Richard M.  Nixon


DS Weekly is one of the many free educational services DrugSense offers our members.  Watch this feature to learn more about what DrugSense can do for you.

TO SUBSCRIBE, UNSUBSCRIBE, OR UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:
Please utilize the following URLs
http://www.drugsense.org/hurry.htm
http://www.drugsense.org/unsub.htm

News/COMMENTS-Editor:   Tom O'Connell ()
Senior-Editor:   Mark Greer ()

We wish to thank all our contributors, editors, NewsHawks and letter writing activists.

NOTICE:  

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.  Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

REMINDER:  

Please help us help reform.  Become a NewsHawk
See http://www.mapinc.org/hawk.htm for info on contributing clippings.


DONATE TO DRUGSENSE ON LINE.  IT'S TAX DEDUCTIBLE.

DrugSense provides many services to at no charge BUT THEY ARE NOT FREE TO PRODUCE.

We incur many costs in creating our many and varied services.  If you are able to help by contributing to the DrugSense effort visit our convenient donation web site at:

http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm

-OR-

Mail in your contribution.  Make checks payable to MAP Inc. send your contribution to:

The Media Awareness Project (MAP) Inc.
d/b/a DrugSense
PO Box 651
Porterville,
CA 93258
(800) 266 5759

http://www.mapinc.org/
http://www.drugsense.org/


RSS DrugSense Weekly current issue this issue

Back Issues: 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010